🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.