🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of federal military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.