🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the crowning highlight of the baseball championship did not occur during the nail-biting finale last Saturday, when her team pulled off multiple dramatic comeback feat after another and then prevailing in overtime against the opposing team.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a electrifying, decisive sequence that at the same time challenged numerous negative misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in the past decades.

The moment itself was breathtaking: Hernández raced in from left field to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, decisive play. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball moments before a runner barreled into him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't merely a remarkable sporting achievement, possibly the decisive shift in momentum in the team's direction after appearing for much of the series like the underdog team. To her, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required uplift for the community and for Los Angeles after a period of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the streets, and a steady stream of criticism from official sources.

"The players presented this alternative story," explained Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, having a distinct kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so simple to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter nowadays – for Molina or for the legions of other Latinos who show up faithfully to matches and occupy as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand spots each time.

The Mixed Connection with the Team

After intensified immigration raids started in the city in June, and national guard troops were deployed into the city to respond to ensuing demonstrations, two of the local soccer clubs quickly released statements of solidarity with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management stated the organization prefer to steer clear of politics – a stance colored, perhaps, by the reality that a significant portion of the supporters, including Latinos, are supporters of current leaders. After considerable public pressure, the team subsequently pledged $one million in support for individuals personally affected by the raids but issued no public condemnation of the government.

White House Visit and Past Legacy

Months earlier, the team did not hesitate in accepting an invitation to celebrate their 2024 championship win at the official residence – a move that local writers described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the team's pride in having been the pioneering major league team to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the principles it represents by executives and present and former athletes. Several players such as the manager had voiced reluctance to go to the White House during the first term but either changed their minds or gave in to demands from the organization.

Business Control and Fan Conflicts

An additional complication for fans is that the team are owned by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to sources and its own published balance sheets, include a stake in a private prison company that runs detention facilities. Guggenheim's leadership has stated many times that it wants to remain neutral of political matters, but its detractors say the inaction – and the financial stake – are their own form of acquiescence to certain policies.

These factors add up to considerable conflicted emotions among Latino supporters in especial – sentiments that emerged even in the euphoria of this season's hard-fought World Series victory and the following outpouring of Dodgers support across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to root for the Dodgers?" local writer Erick Galindo reflected at the start of the playoffs in an thoughtful article ruminating on "team loyalty in our veins, but doubt in our hearts". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared strongly, to the point that he believed his personal protest must have brought the team the fortune it needed to succeed.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Many supporters who have similar misgivings appear to have concluded that they can keep to support the team and its roster of global players, featuring the Asian superstar a key player, while pouring scorn on the team's business overlords. Nowhere was this more evident than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in support of the coach and his players but jeered the executive and the chief executive of the investors.

"The executives in formal attire don't get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team longer than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, though, runs deeper than just the team's current owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s required the municipality razing three low-income Latino communities on a elevated area overlooking the city center and then selling the land to the team for a fraction of its market value. A song on a 2005 album that documents the story has an low-income parking attendant at the venue stating that the house he forfeited to eviction is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly southern California most widely followed Latino columnist and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, problematic dynamic between the team and its fanbase. He describes the team the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for decades.

"They've acted around Hispanic fans while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano noted over the warmer months, when demands to boycott the team over its lack of reaction to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the awkward fact that attendance at home games remained steady, even at the height of the protests when the city center was subject to a evening restriction.

Global Stars and Fan Bonds

Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a simple task, {