🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the pressure of her parent’s heritage. Being the child of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the prominent British artists of the 1900s, her name was enveloped in the deep shadows of the past.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to produce the inaugural album of her piano concerto from 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, soulful lyricism, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will provide new listeners deep understanding into how the composer – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – conceived of her reality as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

However about the past. It requires time to adjust, to perceive forms as they truly exist, to tell reality from distortion, and I was reluctant to address the composer’s background for a while.

I earnestly desired the composer to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, she was. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be detected in several pieces, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the names of her family’s music to see how he heard himself as not only a flag bearer of UK romantic tradition as well as a advocate of the Black diaspora.

It was here that parent and child appeared to part ways.

The United States assessed the composer by the brilliance of his music as opposed to the his racial background.

Family Background

As a student at the Royal College of Music, the composer – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – began embracing his heritage. When the African American poet the renowned Dunbar visited the UK in the late 19th century, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He adapted this literary work to music and the subsequent year adapted his verses for a musical work, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, particularly among African Americans who felt vicarious pride as American society assessed his work by the excellence of his compositions as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition did not reduce Samuel’s politics. In 1900, he was present at the First Pan African Conference in England where he made the acquaintance of the African American intellectual this influential figure and observed a range of talks, including on the subjugation of Black South Africans. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders such as this intellectual and Booker T Washington, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even discussed racial problems with the American leader while visiting to the White House in that year. In terms of his art, Du Bois recalled, “he established his reputation so notably as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He died in 1912, aged 37. However, how would the composer have thought of his offspring’s move to work in this country in the that decade?

Issues and Stance

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the correct approach”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she revised her statement: she did not support with apartheid “in principle” and it “could be left to run its course, overseen by good-intentioned people of all races”. Were the composer more in tune to her father’s politics, or from segregated America, she might have thought twice about the policy. Yet her life had protected her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I hold a UK passport,” she stated, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my background.” Thus, with her “fair” skin (as Jet put it), she floated within European circles, buoyed up by their acclaim for her late father. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the Cape Town university and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in that location, featuring the bold final section of her concerto, named: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a confident pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her piece. Rather, she always led as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era played under her baton.

The composer aspired, in her own words, she “could introduce a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, circumstances deteriorated. When government agents discovered her African heritage, she had to depart the nation. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the UK representative advised her to leave or be jailed. She went back to the UK, deeply ashamed as the magnitude of her inexperience became clear. “The lesson was a difficult one,” she lamented. Increasing her disgrace was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Common Narrative

While I reflected with these memories, I perceived a familiar story. The narrative of holding UK citizenship until it’s challenged – that brings to mind Black soldiers who served for the British during the World War II and made it through but were not given their earned rewards. Including those from Windrush,